The valuation of a fast-growing or restructuring company cannot be based on a simple perpetual annuity formula, because its cash flows are not yet stabilized. A two-period model should be used that distinguishes between the transformation phase and the maturity phase.
Here is the detailed methodology:
1. First Period: Transformation and Growth (Explicit Horizon)
This period, lasting N years (usually 5 to 10 years), corresponds to the phase when the company transforms, restructures its activity or experiences rapid growth. During this phase, Free Cash Flows (FCF) are not simply deducted from each other by a constant rate.
- Method: A detailed financial model (Business Plan) must be built to forecast the flow of funds year by year.
- Sub-periods: This first phase can itself be subdivided (e.g. a restructuring phase, followed by a phase of strong growth, then a phase of moderate growth) before reaching maturity.
Calculation of the value (EV1): The present sum of the FCF generated during these N years is calculated.
2. Second period: maturity (terminal value)
It is considered that from year N, the company has completed its transformation and reached cruising speed. It is then assumed that FCFs grow indefinitely at a stable rate (g), close to inflation.
- Calculation of the value in year N (): The perpetual annuity formula (Gordon-Shapiro) is used on the normative flow at the end of the period.
- Discounting (): As this terminal value is located in the future (in year N), it is imperative to update it to obtain its value today.
3. Total Enterprise Value
The value of the company is the sum of the values of the two periods:
Enterprise Value (EV) = EV1 (Explicit Flows) + EV2 (Discounted Terminal Value)
Important points of vigilance
- The weight of the terminal value: Sensitivity analysis often shows that a very significant proportion (sometimes majority) of the total value comes from the terminal value (EV2). This means that valuation is based on distant and uncertain bets.
- The choice of growth rate (g): To avoid overvaluation (“trees never rise to the sky”), it is recommended to be careful. The g-rate must not exceed the growth rate of the economy (GDP) or inflation. It is even suggested to consider a decrease in performance (negative rate) to reflect the erosion of competitive advantages.
- Alternative by Economic Profit: To limit the risk of overvaluation of the terminal period, an alternative method is to discount future Economic Profit by modeling a decline in performance (the fade) that tends to zero in the long run, reflecting the fact that it is difficult to beat the market indefinitely.